University of California Center for Accelerated Innovation

Funding Opportunities

UC Biomedical Pitch Day 
February 10, 2020

PURPOSE

The UC Center for Accelerated Innovation (CAI) and UC Biomedical Research Acceleration, Integration and Development (BRAID) are partnering with UC Irvine Beall Applied Innovation to host a forum for UC Faculty to pitch advanced translational programs (devices, health IT/wireless, diagnostics and tools) to a group of potential investors.

OPPORTUNITY

An idea can be pitched 10 times before an interested investor is found. Gain experience and knowledge by pitching directly to an audience of potential investors. Therapeutic areas can cover any health condition where there is an unmet medical need or the potential for significant improvement over current diagnostics, devices, tools or services.

Successful applicants will receive extensive hands-on mentoring to develop a pitch deck for presentation to a group of selected and interested investors. Following Pitch Day, investors interested in projects will work with the faculty and Technology Transfer Office associated with that respective faculty's campus to determine whether terms can be reached for investment and potential company launch.

Presentations will be in person at UC Irvine. Application period is November 4-8, 2019.

ELIGIBILITY

Faculty in all series and ranks at the UC campuses (UC Berkeley, Davis, Irvine, Los Angeles, Merced, Riverside, San Diego, San Francisco, Santa Barbara, and Santa Cruz) are eligible. Postdoctoral scholars are eligible to submit applications as Co-PI with a faculty PI.

Visit the University of California Biomedical Pitch Day RFA page for complete information and to apply.

Harrington Discovery Institute

The Harrington Discovery Institute is an international initiative that helps translate scientific discoveries into medicines that benefit society. Their programs address a range of disease areas with an emphasis on areas of high unmet need. Through the funding and expertise they provide, they help bridge critical gaps that exist within academic drug development. On January 8, 2019, business representatives from the Harrington Discovery Institute shared information about Harrington Discovery Institute’s acceleration and funding programs.

View all Harrington Discovery Institute funding opportunities here.

WATCH THE WEBINAR

).

Speakers:
Julianne Roseman & Joe Barone
Business Development, Harrington Discovery Institute 

UC Pitch Day - June 2019

  UC Pitch Day
June 28, 2019

PURPOSE

The UC Center for Accelerated Innovation (CAI) and UC Biomedical Research, Integration and Development (BRAID) are partnering with UCI Applied Innovation to host a forum for UC Faculty to pitch advanced translational programs to a group of potential investors.

BACKGROUND

It can be difficult for academic innovators to find investors for their translational programs. Similarly, it can be difficult for investors to find the most meritorious program for commercialization in a system as large as the University of California. Furthermore, faculty frequently are insufficiently prepared to present their data and plans in a format that investors can readily assess.

The UC CAI has been soliciting, vetting, ranking, and mentoring faculty innovators for the past five years. During the past two years it has partnered with UCI Applied Innovation to sponsor pitch days in the areas of interest for the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI). This process has successfully identified programs of significant value and also helped prepare faculty to concisely describe their program in terms of an investment thesis including: meeting an unmet medical need, a product profile, milestones, timelines, go-no go points, and an activity-based budget.

The sponsoring partners of this UC Pitch Day are confident that there are numerous investment-ready programs across the UC CAI campuses (UCD, UCI, UCLA, UCSD, and UCSF). Furthermore, it is likely that these programs will offer attractive investment opportunities if the presentations are framed in an accessible format. This program extends UC CAI activities beyond the areas of heart, lung, and blood across all therapeutic areas. Successful applicants will receive extensive hands-on mentoring to help the faculty present to a group of selected and interested investors.

THE OPPORTUNITY

Each faculty applicant will submit a 1-page description of their technology (see below for details). UC CAI will invite a select number of applicants to participate via webcast in a pre-screen pitch. This will provide an opportunity for two-way communication with a review committee composed of UC CAI leadership, clinical leaders and investors, for clarification and/or additional information. Following the pre-screen pitch, the highest ranked proposals will undergo a review by UC BRAID leadership. Final selection of technologies to present on the UC Pitch Day will be determined by a committee of representatives from UC CAI, UC BRAID, and UCI Applied Innovation, taking into account the feedback from clinical leaders and investors.

Successful applicants will be mentored by Entrepreneurs-in-Residence and by UC faculty with business expertise. The goal is to develop a presentation designed to help investors identify opportunities for follow-up. Following Pitch Day, investors interested in projects will work with the faculty and Technology Transfer Office associated with that respective faculty's campus to determine whether terms can be reached for investment and potential company launch.

PROCESS

Eligibility: Faculty in all series and ranks at UC Davis, UC Irvine, UCLA, UC San Diego, and UC San Francisco are eligible. Postdoctoral scholars are eligible to submit applications as Co-PI with a faculty PI.

Requirements: Projects must have existing or imminent target validation in animal systems or human cell lines and a clear clinical indication. Devices and diagnostics must also have proof of principle. Therapeutic areas can cover any health condition where there is an unmet medical need or the potential for significant improvement over current treatments, diagnostics, devices, tools or services. If patents or patent applications have not been filed, there should be a strong potential for obtaining defensible intellectual property.

Consultations: The UC CAI offers expert consultations to assist applicants with their proposals. In preparation for their submission, we strongly encourage applicants to schedule a consultation with the site leader on their campus. Contact information for campus site leaders can be found below.

Application: Applications must be submitted online* between April 1-8, 2019 only. Submission closes at 5 pm on April 8.

*NOTE: A UCLA logon ID is required to access the application system, but a UCLA affiliation is not required to create one. View detailed step-by-step instructions on creating a UCLA logon ID here.

Minimum specifications are Arial, 11-points, half-inch margins on all sides, 8.5 x 11 paper. The following information is required:

  1. One-page executive summary (non-confidential)
  2. Title of project
  3. Names, institutions, telephone numbers and emails of PIs and Co-PIs
  4. IRB, IACUC, Stem Cell information, if applicable
  5. Statement of IP Position
  6. NIH biosketch

Executive Summary (one-page limit): The executive summary should, at a minimum, address the following. Please do not include confidential information.

  1. Problem you are addressing
  2. Solution and technology / value proposition
  3. Market Opportunity
  4. Competitive Landscape
  5. Unique Opportunity
  6. Go-to-Market Strategy
  7. Team

Statement of IP Position: Consider the novelty of your technology and patent eligibility. Describe the extent of interactions with the technology transfer office. Please include a list of the various types of IP filed or granted (including patent application number, issued patent number, title, status and date) and the major types of claims (e.g., composition of matter claims, use claims, process of manufacturing claims). Also list the IP events anticipated during development.

Biosketch: Provide biosketches of PI and Co-PIs. Use PHS 398 NIH Biographical Sketch Format Page form found at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html. There is a five-page maximum for each biosketch.

Selection and Scoring: UC CAI will invite a select number of applicants to participate via webcast in a pre-screen pitch. Applications will be peer-reviewed by a committee of UC CAI leadership, clinical leaders, and investors using the criteria below. Following the pre-screen pitch, the highest ranked proposals will then undergo review by UC BRAID leadership. Final selection of technologies to present on the UC Pitch Day will be determined by a committee of representatives from UC CAI, UC BRAID, and UC Applied Innovation, taking into account the feedback from clinical leaders and investors.

REVIEW CRITERIA (click to expand)

Review Criteria

Review Questions

Problem or Need

  • Has the need been clearly stated?
  • What is the associated prevention, mortality or costs?
  • Why is this a significant problem?

Proposed Product/Solution

  • Is the proposed solution linked to an unmet need?
  • How is this proposed product/solution innovative?
  • If successful, will the proposed solution be transformative?
  • How would use of the product/solution fit with current physician practice/standard of care?

Competition and Competitive Advantage

  • Are the adjacent spaces and substitution options identified?
  • How is the product/solution better than others that are currently in use?
  • How is the product/solution better than what is expected to come to the market?

Target Market

  • Has the total market been identified? 3-year trends and projections? Is there adequate justification for the market size?
  • Is the specific addressable target market size defined?
  • What is the expected pricing of the product/solution? How can it be justified (comparable, value/price trade-offs)?
  • What is the peak revenue projection?

Team

  • Do investigators have the necessary strengths and expertise to accomplish the work plan and aims?
  • Can investigators adapt to changing circumstances and advice?
  • Is the quality of the team appropriate for the work that needs to be done? Why is this the correct team for the present stage of the technology?


PITCH DAY PRESENTATIONS

Presentations will be in person at UC Irvine or by webcast. Additional details will be provided to invited applicants.

TIMELINE

RFA Announcement: February 27, 2019
Application deadline: April 8, 2019 5 PM PT
Pitch Day invitations: May 31, 2019
Pitch Day: June 28, 2019

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Is my invention too early for a pitch?

The most effective pitches promote technologies where credible evidence exists to support the future use of the invention by physicians and their patients, and its potential health benefits. Investors expect well-supported data that after further development along a well-defined path the invention will perform effectively in its intended application. Applications that present general concepts or unproven ideas are much less likely to garner support. It would be better to present technologies where a patent/IP has been filed by your tech transfer office, even if it has not yet been issued. In addition, some discussion should pertain to the competitive environment and the regulatory and reimbursement considerations surrounding the technology.

Do I need to have physicians on my team?

The strongest proposals consider both the unmet medical need for the invention and the environment into which the realized invention will fit. In addition to any physicians who advise you on the medical and scientific aspects of the invention, experienced clinicians can be very helpful with considering the setting in which the device, test or medication will be used. Consult with clinicians to explore the potential advantages or problems of the technology in day-to-day use, and how these can be optimized during development. Adding clinicians to the team or testimonials from them adds to the use-case validity and audience/investor credibility of the pitch.

How do I assess the market potential of the invention?

The most convincing method considers what marketed technologies of known value will be replaced/substituted by your invention. With the exception of diseases where no good options are available (e.g. pancreatic cancer or Alzheimer’s disease) or truly transformative technologies (e.g. insulin, polio vaccine, penicillin) physicians and patients are usually conservative and the adoption of most effective technologies is slow and partial. In situations where no comparable technology is marketed, examine analogous marketed technologies with similar effectiveness targeting a disease with a similar incidence and severity. Additional guidance on market sizing can be found here.

Do I need an issued patent to be allowed to pitch?

Although technologies that are well protected by patents, copyrights, trademarks or trade secrets are more attractive to investors, in reality establishing such protection takes time, often years. At the minimum, the invention should be disclosed to the university so that the university Office of Intellectual Property can assess whether the invention can be protected. More information related to the IP considerations can be found here.

Can I pitch an invention if I already started a company based on that invention and licensed the invention to this company?

Yes! Unlike our previous program which provided NIH/NHLBI funds to inventors to advance their technology, the current pitch program is designed to offer a forum for investment into all technologies developed at one of the participating UC campuses.

Does the pitch have to be in the areas of heart, lung and blood diseases?

No, we deliberately broadened the area to include all health-related applications.

What makes for a good pitch?

There are many ways to make an effective pitch, but it is important to balance a number of considerations including scientific credibility, market sensitivity, and team capability in order to resonate with prospective investors. We suggest the following resources as references to help make a good pitch:

 

QUESTIONS

About application requirements and process:

UC Davis
Laura Marcu
Site Leader
lmarcu@ucdavis.edu

Anuurad Erdembileg
Site Administrator
anuerdem@ucdavis.edu

UC Irvine
Elliot Botvinick
Site Leader
elliot.botvinick@uci.edu

Andria Pontello
Project Manager
apontell@uci.edu

UCLA
Tomas Ganz
Site Leader
tganz@mednet.ucla.edu

Breanna Davis
Project Manager
bjdavis@mednet.ucla.edu

UC San Diego
Robert Ross
Site Leader
rross@ucsd.edu

Vish Krishnan
Skills Development Leader
vkrishnan@ucsd.edu

UC San Francisco 
Roopa Ramamoorthi
Project Manager
Roopa.Ramamoorthi@ucsf.edu

Nathaniel Prorok
Site Administrator
Nathaniel.Prorok@ucsf.edu


About the website and online submission tool:

Rey Encarnacion
Technical Support
rfpsupport@mednet.ucla.edu

 

UC Pitch Day - November 2018

University of California Center for Accelerated Innovation (UC CAI)

UC Pitch Day
November 30, 2018

PURPOSE

UC CAI and UC BRAID are partnering with UCI Applied Innovation to host a forum for UC Faculty to pitch advanced translational programs to a group of potential investors.

BACKGROUND

It can be difficult for academic innovators to find investors for their translational programs. Similarly, it can be difficult for investors to find the most meritorious program for commercialization in a system as large as the University of California. Furthermore, faculty frequently are insufficiently prepared to present their data and plans in a format that investors can readily assess.

The UC CAI has been soliciting, vetting, ranking, and mentoring faculty innovators for the past five years. During the past two years it has partnered with UCI Applied Innovation to sponsor pitch days in the areas of interest for the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI). This process has successfully identified programs of significant value and also helped prepare faculty to concisely describe their program in terms of an investment thesis including: meeting an unmet medical need, a product profile, milestones, timelines, go-no go points, and an activity-based budget.

The sponsoring partners of this UC Pitch Day are confident that there are numerous investment-ready programs across the UC CAI campuses (UCD, UCI, UCLA, UCSD, and UCSF). Furthermore, it is likely that these programs will offer attractive investment opportunities if the presentations are framed in an accessible format. This program proposes to extend the UC CAI activities beyond the areas of heart, lung, and blood across all therapeutic areas. Successful applicants will receive extensive hands-on mentoring to help the faculty present to a group of selected and interested investors.

THE OPPORTUNITY

Each faculty applicant will submit a 1-page description of their technology (see below for details). Each campus will review all proposals. The local review committee may meet with each faculty member for clarification and/or additional information. The highest scoring proposals from each campus will then be submitted to a UC CAI review panel composed of UC CAI site leaders, clinical leaders, and business associates to rank each of the forwarded proposals. The ranked projects will then undergo a review by UC BRAID and finally, by a panel of investors to select those that will present on the Pitch Day.

Successful applicants will be mentored by Entrepreneurs-in-Residence from the NIH and by UC faculty with business expertise. The goal is to develop a presentation designed to help investors identify opportunities for follow-up. Following Pitch Day, investors interested in projects will work with the faculty and Technology Transfer Office associated with that respective faculty's campus to determine whether terms can be reached for investment and potential company launch.

PROCESS

Eligibility: Faculty in all series and ranks at UC Davis, UC Irvine, UCLA, UC San Diego, and UC San Francisco are eligible. Postdoctoral scholars are eligible to submit applications as Co-PI with a faculty PI.

Requirements: Projects must have existing or imminent target validation in animal systems or human cell lines and a clear clinical indication. Devices and diagnostics must also have proof of principle. Therapeutic areas can cover any health condition where there is an unmet medical need or the potential for significant improvement over current treatments, diagnostics, devices, tools or services. If patents or patent applications have not been filed, there should be a strong potential for obtaining defensible intellectual property.

Consultations: The UC CAI offers expert consultations to assist applicants with their proposals. In preparation for their submission, we strongly encourage applicants to schedule a consultation with the site leader on their campus. Contact information for campus site leaders can be found below.

Application: Applications must be submitted online* between September 17-24 only. Submission closes at 5 pm on September 24.

*NOTE: A UCLA logon ID is required to access the application system, but a UCLA affiliation is not required to create one. View detailed step-by-step instructions on creating a UCLA logon ID here.

Minimum specifications are Arial, 11-points, half-inch margins on all sides, 8 � x 11 paper. The following information is required:

  1. One-page executive summary (non-confidential)
  2. Title of project
  3. Names, institutions, telephone numbers and emails of PIs and Co-PIs
  4. IRB, IACUC, Stem Cell information, if applicable
  5. Statement of IP Position
  6. NIH biosketch

Executive Summary (one-page limit): The executive summary should, at a minimum, address the following. Please do not include confidential information.

  1. Problem you are addressing
  2. Solution and technology / value proposition
  3. Market Opportunity
  4. Competitive Landscape
  5. Unique Opportunity
  6. Go-to-Market Strategy
  7. Team

Statement of IP Position: Consider the novelty of your technology and patent eligibility. Describe the extent of interactions with the technology transfer office. Please include a list of the various types of IP filed or granted (including patent application number, issued patent number, title, status and date) and the major types of claims (e.g., composition of matter claims, use claims, process of manufacturing claims). Also list the IP events anticipated during development.

Biosketch: Provide biosketches of PI and Co-PIs. Use PHS 398 NIH Biographical Sketch Format Page form found at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html. There is a five-page maximum for each biosketch.

Selection and Scoring: Applications will be peer-reviewed using the criteria below and the NIH 9-point scoring scale (1=exceptional; 9=poor; see section C). Applications are first scored by a study section on the applicant's campus. High-scoring proposals will then undergo review by UC BRAID leadership and an investor panel.

REVIEW CRITERIA (click to expand)

Review Criteria

Review Questions

Problem or Need

  • Has the need been clearly stated?
  • What is the associated prevention, mortality or costs?
  • Why is this a significant problem?

Proposed Product/Solution

  • Is the proposed solution linked to an unmet need?
  • How is this proposed product/solution innovative?
  • If successful, will the proposed solution be transformative?
  • How would use of the product/solution fit with current physician practice/standard of care?

Competition and Competitive Advantage

  • Are the adjacent spaces and substitution options identified?
  • How is the product/solution better than others that are currently in use?
  • How is the product/solution better than what is expected to come to the market?

Target Market

  • Has the total market been identified? 3-year trends and projections? Is there adequate justification for the market size?
  • Is the specific addressable target market size defined?
  • What is the expected pricing of the product/solution? How can it be justified (comparable, value/price trade-offs)?
  • What is the peak revenue projection?

Team

  • Do investigators have the necessary strengths and expertise to accomplish the work plan and aims?
  • Can investigators adapt to changing circumstances and advice?
  • Is the quality of the team appropriate for the work that needs to be done? Why is this the correct team for the present stage of the technology?


PITCH DAY PRESENTATIONS

Presentations will be in person at UC Irvine or by webcast. For medical devices it is best to bring in a prototype or webcast with it in hand. Additional details will be provided to invited applicants.

TIMELINE

RFA Announcement: September 4, 2018
Application deadline: September 24, 2018 5 PM PT
Pitch Day invitations: November 1, 2018
Pitch Day: November 30, 2018

QUESTIONS

About application requirements and process:

UC Davis
Laura Marcu
Site Leader
lmarcu@ucdavis.edu

Anuurad Erdembileg
Site Administrator
anuerdem@ucdavis.edu

UC Irvine
Elliot Botvinick
Site Leader
elliot.botvinick@uci.edu

Andria Pontello
Project Manager
apontell@uci.edu

UCLA
Tomas Ganz
Site Leader
tganz@mednet.ucla.edu

Breanna Davis
Project Manager
bjdavis@mednet.ucla.edu

UC San Diego
Robert Ross
Site Leader
rross@ucsd.edu

Vish Krishnan
Skills Development Leader
vkrishnan@ucsd.edu

UC San Francisco 
Roopa Ramamoorthi
Project Manager
Roopa.Ramamoorthi@ucsf.edu

Nathaniel Prorok
Site Administrator
Nathaniel.Prorok@ucsf.edu


About the website and online submission tool:

Rey Encarnacion
Technical Support
rfpsupport@mednet.ucla.edu

 

NHLBI Technology Development Award

NHLBI Technology Development Award

PURPOSE

The UC CAI invites applications for development of novel technologies that address heart, lung and blood diseases. This opportunity will support a broad range of drugs, devices (including wireless devices), diagnostics and tools with high potential of becoming commercially viable products that address an unmet need.

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular, lung and blood diseases affect nearly 145 million Americans and account for three of the four leading causes of death. The University of California medical campuses at Davis, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego and San Francisco have a rich research base to support a robust pipeline of technologies to improve human health. Biomedical companies increasingly seek later-stage technologies for licensing and development. UC CAI will incubate promising technologies from UC innovators with the goal of advancing them toward licensing and commercialization for patient benefit.

The Award: Technology Development Awards provide up to $200,000* in grant ($100,000 in direct costs) and matching ($100,000 in direct costs) support** for a period of up to two years, as well as mentoring and project management support. It is anticipated that up to six awards will be made. NIH guidelines for annual and end-of- project reporting will apply. Carry forward of funds is not allowed.

  • *Most technologies will be awarded at $200,000. However, if you feel your technology would substantially benefit from up to $400,000, please submit a budget, milestones and timelines at both funding levels.

  • **Awards must be matched 1:1 with non-federal funds. See Budgets, below.

NEW for 2018!! UC CAI is hosting a pitch day to provide an opportunity for two-way communication with CAI leadership and industry experts. Selected pre-applicants will pitch their technology to outside industry experts, providing an opportunity for exposure and real-time feedback. The pitch day will allow applicants to make business connections, write a more competitive proposal and inform CAI leadership as to the nature, utility and commercial potential of their invention.

Eligibility: Faculty in all series and ranks at UC Davis, UC Irvine, UCLA, UC San Diego, and UC San Francisco are eligible. Postdoctoral scholars are eligible to submit applications as Co-PI with a faculty PI.

Requirements: Projects must have existing or imminent target validation in animal systems or human cell lines and a clear clinical indication. Therapeutic areas can cover any health condition within NIH NHLBI disease domains (heart, lung and sleep, blood) where there is an unmet medical need or the potential for significant improvement over current treatments, diagnostics, devices, tools or services (click here for list of targeted health conditions). Note: If you are targeting an infectious disease, please discuss eligibility with your site leader before submitting a pre-application. If patents or patent applications have not been filed, there should be a strong potential for obtaining defensible intellectual property. If the proposal is a continuation of an existing project, the applicant must demonstrate an impact on translation beyond current efforts.

Application Webinar Series: To assist applicants on required components of their proposals, a webinar series was offered on the topics below. Applicants are strongly advised to review webinar content at: https://ctsi.ucla.edu/cai/pages/ncai_application

  • Market size and competitive landscape
  • Intellectual property
  • Reimbursement
  • Regulatory strategies

Consultations: The UC CAI offers expert consultations to assist applicants with their proposals. In preparation for their submission, we strongly encourage applicants to schedule a consultation with the site leader on their campus. Contact information for campus site leaders can be found below.

Selection Process: UC CAI will invite innovators to participate in a pitch day on the basis of a pre-application. Full applicants will be invited following the pitch day.

PRE-APPLICATION DETAILS (click to expand)

The pre-application may be submitted from March 19 to March 23 only. Submission closes at 5 pm on March 23. The following information is required:

  1. Title of research proposal
  2. Names, institutions, telephone numbers and emails of PIs and Co-PIs
  3. IRB, IACUC, Stem Cell information, if applicable
  4. Abstract
  5. Proposal narrative (two-page maximum)
  6. Statement of IP Position
  7. NIH biosketch
  8. Budget

Technical requirements: Items 5-8 above are document uploads (doc or pdf). Minimum specifications are Arial, 11-points, half-inch margins on all sides, 8 � x 11 paper. Letters of Support are not accepted for pre-applications.

Instructions for pre-application proposal narrative: The pre- application narrative will consist of two pages (three pages for proposals requesting up to $400,000), including figures and tables. References are excluded from the page count. The narrative should be organized using the headings below. Each area must be addressed.

  1. Significance – Describe the scope and nature of the problem you are trying to solve. Define customers (e.g., patients, practitioners, researchers) and the context in which they want the problem solved.
  2. Innovation and Impact – Describe your proposed solution and what is innovative about it. Define the impact you hope to accomplish using metrics most appropriate for you (e.g., morbidity, mortality, costs).
  3. Competition – List the competing approaches customers can use to address the problem, including products, services and compensating behaviors (e.g., work- arounds).
  4. Work Plan and Aims – Describe the proposed project and specific milestones. Describe how successful completion of the project will advance the technology (e.g., licensing, investment, or value inflection point, such as target validation or prototype generation). Proposals requesting up to $400,000 must submit milestones and timelines at both funding levels of $200,000 and $400,000.

Resubmissions: Resubmitted pre-applications must contain an introduction that precedes the proposal narrative, of no more than one page, that responds to comments from the previous review. Note: this one-page introduction will not be counted towards the proposal narrative two-page limit.

Statement of IP Position: Consider the novelty of your technology and patent eligibility. Describe the extent of interactions with the technology transfer office. Please include a list of the various types of IP filed or granted (including patent application number, issued patent number, title, status and date) and the major types of claims (e.g., composition of matter claims, use claims, process of manufacturing claims). Also list the IP events anticipated during development.

Biosketch: Provide biosketches of PI and Co-PIs. Use PHS 398 NIH Biographical Sketch Format Page form found at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html. There is a five-page maximum for each biosketch.

Budgets: Refer to the table below for allowable costs. Total costs (direct plus indirect costs) for subawards to other institutions must be included within the total $200,000 direct cost budget maximum. Applicants must submit separate budgets and budget justifications for years 1 and 2 (use PHS 398 Form Pg. 4 “Detailed Budget for Initial Period), and a budget for the entire proposed project period (use PHS 398 Form Pg. 5 “Budget for Entire Proposed Project Period). Separate budgets and budget justifications for years 1 and 2 must also be submitted for subawards. Proposals requesting up to $400,000 must provide budgets at both funding levels of $200,000 and $400,000. Budget forms can be found here: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/f unding/phs398/phs398.html.

It is required that each grant be matched 1:1 with non-federal funds at the time of the award. APPLICANTS MUST MEET WITH THEIR SITE ADMINISTRATION PRIOR TO SUBMISSION TO DISCUSS THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE MATCHING SUPPORT.

strong>Allowable Budget Costs

 

Allowable

Not Allowable

PI Salary and Benefits *† X  
Post Doc Salary and Benefits X  
K career development awardees – salary support   X
Consultants and Sub-contracting** X  
Administrative Support   X
Supplies X  
Equipment X  
Software X  
Personal Computers   X
Mailing   X
Tuition   X
Travel*** X  
Research Staff Support (e.g., SRA, Lab Tech) – salary and benefits X  
Patient Care   X

* NIH base salary cap

† Proposals requesting large salary support are discouraged and will be carefully reviewed

** Applicants are strongly encouraged to utilize consultants and contracted services

*** Travel is restricted to local travel between project sites




Selection and Scoring: Pre-applications will be scored by a study section on the applicant's campus using the criteria below. Pre- applications will receive an impact score. The NIH 9-point scoring scale (1=exceptional; 9=poor; see section C) will be used. High-scoring proposals (about 20% of total submissions) will be invited to participate in the pitch day.

Review Criteria

Review Criteria

Review Questions

Location within the Proposal

Unmet Need

  • Why is this a significant problem?
  • What is the associated prevention, mortality or costs?
  • Have the users of this technology been identified?
  • Significance
  • Innovation and Impact

Innovation and Impact

  • Is the proposed solution linked to an unmet need?
  • How is this proposed solution innovative?
  • If successful, will the proposed solution be transformative?
  • Innovation and Impact
  • Competition

Competition

  • Are competitive technologies addressed?
  • Competition

Work Plan and Specific Aims

  • Is the plan well described?
  • Is the plan feasible and consistent with the budget?
  • Does the proposal build on prior work or data?
  • Will the work advance the technology to a significant value point (e.g., licensing, investment, target validation, prototype generation)?
  • Work Plan
  • Budget

Investigators

  • Do investigators have the necessary strengths and expertise to accomplish the work plan and aims?
  • Biosketches

Intellectual Property

  • Has invention disclosure occurred?
  • Has a patent application been filed?
  • Has a patent been approved?
  • Is there a previous licensing event and how does this affect the IP strategy?
  • Statement of IP position

PITCH DAY DETAILS (click to expand)

A select number of pre-applicants will be invited to participate in a pitch day hosted at UC Irvine. This will involve a presentation to UC CAI leadership and industry experts. Panelists will evaluate the status of your technology and development, business plan, and commercial viability. Full applicants will be invited following pitch day. Resources for creating a pitch deck can be found at: https://ctsi.ucla.edu/cai/pages/ncai_application#pitch.

Format:

  1. Presentations will be in person or by webcast.
  2. For medical devices it is best to bring in a prototype or webcast with it in hand

Additional details will be provided to invited applicants.

FULL APPLICATION DETAILS (click to expand)

The full application may be submitted from April 23-30 only. Submission closes at 5 pm on April 30.

Application components are listed below. Items 1-9 are required. Item 10 is optional.

  1. Title of research proposal
  2. Names, institutions, telephone numbers and emails of PIs and Co-PIs
  3. IRB, IACUC, Stem Cell information, if applicable
  4. Abstract
  5. Proposal narrative (eight-page maximum)
  6. Commercial Assessment (to be completed by the campus TTO; see below)
  7. Budget (see Budgets, below)
  8. NIH biosketch
  9. Product Profile
  10. Letters of Support (optional)

Technical requirements: Items 5-10 above are document uploads (doc or pdf). Minimum specifications are Arial, 11-points, half-inch margins on all sides, 8 � x 11 paper. Applicants must submit a Commercial Assessment, Budget and Biosketches. Applicants may resubmit the Budget and Biosketches used in the pre- application if the information is unchanged.

Instructions for full-application proposal-narrative: The full application narrative will consist of eight pages (nine pages for proposals requesting up to $400,000), including figures and tables. References and product profiles are excluded from the page count. The narrative should be organized using the headings below. Each area must be addressed.

I. Basis for Project

  1. Background – Describe the scope and nature of the problem the technology will address, and give a briefdescription of the solution. Some elements to include are: disease burden, market space in which the product would operate, and comparison of your solution to the current and predicted standard of care, including target product profile if applicable.
  2. Unmet Need – Clearly state the unmet need being addressed by the technology and provide evidence to support the need from multiple stakeholder perspectives (e.g., patient, clinician, payer).
  3. Proposed Product/Solution – Describe your proposed solution and what is innovative about it. Identify the setting in which it will be utilized (ICU, in- patient, out-patient, primary care physician, etc.), and the primary patient population / indication for use. Characterize the expected benefit from the technology and how it will enhance current or predicted (when this product will be on the market) standard of care or replace the current standard of care. What is the evidence to support the expected benefit? Provide a brief synopsis of your preliminary data.
  4. Market Size and Strategy – Define the total and addressable market size, and target price of the technology. Support your market size and descriptions with evidence about current technologies or approaches to address this indication. Define a specific patient segment of those suffering from the specific targeted disease. What are the market population trends and projections? Webinar available.
  5. Competitive Landscape – Define the competition mix (companies, products, substitutes and shifting landscape) for the technology. Think particularly about how the disease will be treated when the technology/product gets to market. How is the landscape shifting or projected to shift? Webinar available.
  6. Intellectual Property –Describe the extent of interactions with the technology transfer office and how the IP is connected to the commercialization plan. Please include a list of the various types of IP filed or granted, which should include the following information: (1) Patent application number, issued patent number, trademark registration number, copyright number, etc; (2) Title: status and date; (3) For a patent/patent application, the major types of claims (e.g., device and method of treating asthma; independent claim to the generic compound and dependent claims to specific species of the compound). Webinar available.

II. Pathways and Requirements for Bringing Product to Market

  1. Differentiation – Explain how the proposed technology is better than current options/technologies and is anadvancement in the current market direction. Provide data to support this, and in lieu of actual data, describe what data would be needed to justify the differentiation. Describe how it’s better than current options/technologies, including those currently in clinical trials.
  2. Regulatory Path (if applicable) – Describe the expected regulatory pathway for the technology and identify which FDA division will regulate the technology. Describe foreseeable regulatory risks or accelerated programs that could impact the technology development. Comment on the clinical trials considerations and how those might impact the regulatory approach. Please also include information on technologies that are currently in development. Webinar available.
  3. Reimbursement Path (if applicable) –  Define similar product(s)/service(s) that is (are) currently being covered forthe indication your technology targets and identify relevant CPT/DRG/APC Codes and their reimbursement rates. If no code exists, how will the technology be paid for? Webinar available.
  4. Funding Requirements –  Identify how much funding is needed to get the technology to a viable ‘exit’ or inflection point for commercial investment. Define the funding requirements to achieve each milestone and each go/no-go decision point for the proposed project. Projecting beyond the completion of the proposed project, estimate the key milestones that need to be achieved and the total funding required to bring the product to a commercial exit. Include an estimate of the long-term return on the overall investment.

III. Project Plan for Bringing Technology Through the NCAI

  1. Product Profiles

    Download and complete the appropriate product profile. Please note, product profiles will not be counted towards the proposal narrative eight-page limit.

    Product Profile Template

    Download Link

    Device Product Profile

    Diagnostic Product Profile

    Digital Health Product Profile

    Therapeutic Product Profile


  2. Product Development Plan – Describe your overall project plan including key intermediate milestones and the final goal to be achieved at the completion of the project. Identify go/no-go decision points and potential pivot points within the plan. Explain how this project plan fits into the overall product development plan. Explain how achievement of each milestone increases the value of the technology. For each milestone, provide a target date for completion. Proposals requesting up to $400,000 must submit milestones and timelines at both funding levels of $200,000 and $400,000. Clearly define what additional value would be obtained at the higher funding level (e.g. specific changes in inflection point).
  3. Potential Risks and Mitigations – Describe the cost and revenue streams associated with commercializing the technology. Identify how much funding is needed to get the technology to a viable ‘exit’ or inflection point for commercial investment. Define the funding requirements to achieve each milestone for the proposed project.  Include reimbursement issues. Discuss the potential for developing the technology for additional unmet needs.
  4. Personnel – Provide the institutional affiliation, relevant background and expertise of the individuals on the team and explain how their backgrounds inform their ability to succeed at this stage of the product development. Consider how they will impact future product development. What will be needed for future product development?
  5. References

Resubmissions: Resubmitted full applications must contain an introduction that precedes the proposal narrative, of no more than two pages, that responds to comments from the previous review. Note: this two-page introduction will not be counted towards the proposal narrative eight-page limit.

Commercial Assessment Form: A commercial assessment form must be completed and signed by your campus technology licensing office. The completed form must be uploaded as part of your application. Applicants are encouraged to complete this form two weeks before the application deadline to ensure they will meet the application deadline. Click here to download the form

Biosketch: Provide biosketches of PI and Co-PIs. Use PHS 398 NIH Biographical Sketch Format Page form found at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/f unding/phs398/phs398.html. There is a five-page maximum for each biosketch.

Budget: Refer to the table below for allowable costs. Total costs (direct plus indirect costs) for subawards to other institutions must be included within the total $200,000 direct cost budget maximum. Applicants must submit separate budgets and budget justifications for years 1 and 2 (use PHS 398 Form Pg. 4 “Detailed Budget for Initial Period), and a budget for the entire proposed project period (use PHS 398 Form Pg. 5 “Budget for Entire Proposed Project Period). Separate budgets and budget justifications for years 1 and 2 must be submitted for subawards. Proposals requesting up to $400,000 must provide budgets at both funding levels of $200,000 and $400,000. Budget forms can be found here: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html.

It is required that each grant be matched 1:1 with non-federal funds at the time of the award. APPLICANTS MUST MEET WITH THEIR SITE ADMINISTRATION PRIOR TO SUBMISSION TO DISCUSS THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE MATCHING SUPPORT.

 

Allowable

Not Allowable

PI Salary and Benefits *† X  
Post Doc Salary and Benefits X  
K career development awardees – salary support   X
Consultants and Sub-contracting** X  
Administrative Support   X
Supplies X  
Equipment X  
Software X  
Personal Computers   X
Mailing   X
Tuition   X
Travel*** X  
Research Staff Support (e.g., SRA, Lab Tech) – salary and benefits X  
Patient Care   X

* NIH base salary cap

† Proposals requesting large salary support are discouraged and will be carefully reviewed

** Applicants are strongly encouraged to utilize consultants and contracted services

*** Travel is restricted to local travel between project sites.


Selection and Scoring: Full applications will be scored by a study section that includes disease and platform experts from academia and industry. The NIH 9-point scoring scale (1=exceptional; 9=poor; see section C) will be used. Full applications will receive an impact score calculated using the NIH scoring system. High-scoring proposals will be forwarded to NHLBI for review. Review criteria are below.

Review Criteria

Review Questions

Background

  • Has sufficient background been provided to help evaluate the need and the solution? What is the market “space” in which this product would operate? What is the current standard of care?

Unmet Need

  • Has the need been clearly stated?
  • Has evidence of the need been provided?
  • Has the expected need from the perspectives of the relevant stakeholders been articulated?

Proposed Product/Solution

  • What is the proposed product/solution, and to what patient subset is this applicable?
  • How is this proposed product/solution innovative?
  • What is the expected benefit with this product/solution, and what is the evidence to support the expected benefit?
  • Is the benefit a major advance or incremental in terms of speed, size, cost- saving, ease of use, safety, efficacy, accuracy or a combination of areas?
  • How would use of the product/solution fit with current physician practice/standard of care?

Market Size
Webinar available

  • Has the total market been identified? 3-year trends and projections? Is thereadequate justification for the market size?
  • Is the specific addressable target market size defined?
  • What is the expected pricing of the product/solution? How can it be justified (comparable, value/price trade-offs)?
  • What is the peak revenue projection?

Competitive Landscape
Webinar available

  • Are the current and anticipated players in the space identified? What competitive products are they developing and/or selling?
  • Are the adjacent spaces and substitution options identified?
  • How is the landscape shifting or projected to shift?

Intellectual Property
Webinar available

  • Has the applicant described its IP protection strategy in sufficient detail?
  • Are the types of IP proposed, or filed, appropriate to protect the invention?
  • Are there other forms of IP protection that the applicant should consider that may be more appropriate (e.g., protecting by trade secret instead of filing patent applications)?
  • How is the IP tied to the commercialization plan?

Differentiation

  • How is the product/solution better than others that are currently in use?
  • How is the product/solution better than what is expected to come to the market?
  • What data needs to be generated to support the differentiation?

Regulatory Path
Webinar available

  • Is the expected regulatory pathway identified?
  • Is the branch/division within the FDA this product would fit into identified?
  • Are regulatory uncertainties or risks identified and addressed?

Reimbursement Path
Webinar available

  • What product/service is currently being covered? What would be comparable?
  • What are the relevant CPT/DRG/APC codes?
  • What are the reimbursement rates for the relevant CPT codes? Has the applicant considered Physician and facility reimbursement? What have the reimbursement rates been over the last year?
  • If no code exists, what do you think are the appropriate next steps to obtain reimbursement?

Funding Requirements

  • Are the financing requirements identified? Are they tied to Go/No-go decisions?
  • Has the applicant defined the funding required to get to the next inflection point?

Product Development Plan

  • What is the ultimate goal of the product development plan and when will that goal be achieved?
  • What are the 2-4 major milestones that need to be achieved in order for the plan to be successful? What is the timing for each milestone?
  • Explain how achievement of each milestone increases the value of the product? Explain how you have validated the accuracy of these milestones? What stakeholders or customers have been referenced for this validation?
  • Have Go/No-Go decision points in the plan been established?
  • Where is the money going to be utilized? How much of it is for project costs?
  • Will the work advance the technology to a significant value point (e.g., licensing, investment, target validation, prototype generation)?
  • Are the project milestones relevant to establishing commercial viability of the projects?

Potential Risks and Mitigations

  • Has the applicant identified potential risks (e.g., scientifically, technically,personnel, market, commercialization) and risk mitigation strategies?

 Personnel

  • Do investigators have the necessary strengths and expertise to accomplish the work plan and aims?
  • Can investigators adapt to changing circumstances and advice?
  • Is the quality of the team appropriate for the work that needs to be done? Why is this the correct team for the present stage of the technology?

SUBMISSION DATES AND TIMES

RFA release: March 3, 2018
Pre-application due: March 23, 2018 5 PM PT
Pitch Day invitations: April 2, 2018
Pitch Day: April 10, 2018
Full application invitations: April 16, 2018
Full application due: April 30, 2018 5 PM PT
Earliest start date: Aug 1, 2018

Additional Information: Successful applicant co-PIs must provide their field of specialization, their NIH Commons ID and their IRB and/or IACUC protocol numbers, if applicable, before funds are released. Recipients must credit NHLBI and cite grant number U54HL119893 in publications that result from this funding.

QUESTIONS

About application requirements and process:

UC Davis
Laura Marcu
Site Leader
lmarcu@ucdavis.edu

Anuurad Erdembileg
Site Administrator
anuerdem@ucdavis.edu

UC Irvine
Elliot Botvinick
Site Leader
elliot.botvinick@uci.edu

Andria Pontello
Project Manager
apontell@uci.edu

UCLA
Tomas Ganz
Site Leader
tganz@mednet.ucla.edu

Breanna Davis
Project Manager
bjdavis@mednet.ucla.edu

UC San Diego
Robert Ross
Site Leader
rross@ucsd.edu

Vish Krishnan
Skills Development Leader
vkrishnan@ucsd.edu

UC San Francisco 
Roopa Ramamoorthi
Project Manager
Roopa.Ramamoorthi@ucsf.edu

Nathaniel Prorok
Site Administrator
Nathaniel.Prorok@ucsf.edu

About the website and online submission tool:
Rey Encarnacion
Technical Support
rfpsupport@mednet.ucla.edu

NHLBI Stimulus Funding Award

NHLBI Stimulus Funding Award

PURPOSE
The goal of the UC CAI Stimulus Grant Program is to provide seed funding to allow technologies to obtain a level of maturity that could allow a more robust application for a UC CAI Technology Development Award. Eligible technologies cover any health condition within NIH NHLBI disease domains (heart, lung and sleep, blood) where there is an unmet medical need or the potential for significant improvement over current treatments, diagnostics, devices, tools or services (click here for list of targeted health conditions).

Awardees will be mentored through key go/no go milestone(s) to help develop an improved project that could have greater success at achieving UC CAI funding than at its present stage. Applicants with early-stage technologies needing additional data or a key experiment to further a project’s progress would benefit from this grant. Completion of key go/no go milestone(s) with this stimulus grant may help projects become more competitive for additional NIH NHLBI UC CAI funding.

BACKGROUND
Biomedical companies are attracted to later-stage technologies for licensing and development. The NHLBI-funded UC CAI Stimulus Grant Program will incubate promising early-stage technologies from UC innovators with the goal of advancing them toward a UC CAI NHLBI Technology Development Award.

The Award: Stimulus Funding Awards provide up to $50,000 in grant support for a period of up to six months, as well as mentoring and project management support. NIH guidelines for annual and end-of- project reporting will apply. Carry forward of funds is not allowed.

Eligibility:Faculty in all series and ranks at UC Davis, UC Irvine, UCLA, UC San Diego, and UC San Francisco are eligible. Project and research scientists and postdoctoral scholars are eligible to submit applications as Co-PI with a faculty PI.

Requirements: Projects must have existing or imminent target validation in animal systems or human cell lines and a clear clinical indication. Therapeutic areas can cover any health condition within NIH NHLBI disease domains (heart, lung and sleep, blood) where there is an unmet medical need or the potential for significant improvement over current treatments, diagnostics, devices, tools or services (click here for list of targeted health conditions). Note: If you are targeting an infectious disease, please discuss eligibility with your site leader before submitting a pre-application. If patents or patent applications have not been filed, there should be a strong potential for obtaining defensible intellectual property. If the proposal is a continuation of an existing project, the applicant must demonstrate an impact on translation beyond current efforts.

Selection Process and Review: All applications will be reviewed by a UC CAI committee consisting of disease and platform experts from academia and industry. The committee will review any concerns or gaps that need to be addressed to increase the likelihood of reaching the proposed milestone and eventual success of the project. The review committee then decides which applicants will receive a Stimulus Funding Award of up to $50,000. Applicants who successfully complete the agreed key go/no go milestone(s) and develop the technology to the appropriate level of maturity will qualify to submit an application for a UC CAI Technology Development Award worth up to $200,000. UC CAI Technology Development Awards are awarded annually for the development of novel technologies that address heart, lung and blood diseases and have a high potential of becoming commercially viable products that address an unmet need.

APPLICATION DETAILS (click to expand)

The application may be submitted from Nov. 14 to Nov. 23 only. Submission closes at 5 pm on Nov 23. The following information is required:
  1. Title of research proposal
  2. Names, institutions, telephone numbers and emails of PIs and Co-PIs
  3. IRB, IACUC, Stem Cell information, if applicable
  4. Abstract
  5. Proposal narrative (two-page maximum). The narrative should be organized using the headings below. Each area must be addressed.
    1. Significance – Describe the scope and nature of the problem you are trying to solve. Clearly state the unmet need being addressed by the technology and provide evidence to support the need from multiple stakeholder perspectives (e.g., patient, clinician, payer).
    2. Innovation and Impact – Describe your proposed solution and what is innovative about it. Define the impact you hope to accomplish using metrics most appropriate for you (e.g., morbidity, mortality, costs).
    3. Competition – List the competing approaches customers can use to address the problem, including products, services and compensating behaviors (e.g., work-arounds).
    4. Work Plan and Aims – Describe the proposed project, including specific milestone(s) and clear go/no-go decision point(s) and target completion date(s). Describe how funding will develop the technology to a maturity appropriate to apply for a UC CAI Technology Development Award. Estimate the key milestones and timelines that would be achieved if additional funding was awarded in the form of a UC CAI Technology Development Award.
    5. Potential Risks and Mitigations – Describe the cost and revenue streams associated with commercializing the technology. Identify how much funding is needed to get the technology to a viable ‘exit’ or inflection point for commercial investment. Define the funding requirements to achieve each milestone for the proposed project. Include reimbursement issues. Discuss the potential for developing the technology for additional unmet needs.
    6. Intellectual Property – Describe the extent of interactions with the technology transfer office and how the IP is connected to the commercialization plan. Please include a list of the various types of IP filed or granted, which should include the following information: (1) Patent application number, issued patent number, trademark registration number, copyright number, etc; (2) Title: status and date; (3) For a patent/patent application, the major types of claims (e.g., device and method of treating asthma; independent claim to the generic compound and dependent claims to specific species of the compound). Webinar available.
  6. Commercial Assessment (to be completed by the campus TTO)
    • Applicants are encouraged to complete this form two weeks before the application deadline to ensure they will meet the application deadline. Click here to download the form.
  7. NIH biosketch
    • Provide biosketches of PI and Co-PIs. Use PHS 398 NIH Biographical Sketch Format Page form found at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html. There is a five-page maximum for each biosketch.
  8. Budget and justification
    • Refer to the table below for allowable costs. Total costs (direct plus indirect costs) for subawards to other institutions must be included within the total $50,000 direct cost budget maximum. Applicants must submit a budget and budget justifications for the 6-month period (use PHS 398 Form Pg. 4 “Detailed Budget for Initial Period). Budget forms can be found here: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/f unding/phs398/phs398.html

       

       

      Allowable

      Not Allowable

      PI Salary and Benefits *† X  
      Post Doc Salary and Benefits X  
      K career development awardees – salary support   X
      Consultants and Sub-contracting** X  
      Administrative Support   X
      Supplies X  
      Equipment X  
      Software X  
      Personal Computers   X
      Mailing   X
      Tuition   X
      Travel*** X  
      Research Staff Support (e.g., SRA, Lab Tech) – salary and benefits X  
      Patient Care   X

       

       

      * NIH base salary cap

      † Proposals requesting large salary support are discouraged and will be carefully reviewed

      ** Applicants are strongly encouraged to utilize consultants and contracted services

      *** Travel is restricted to local travel between project sites

  9. Product Profiles
    Download the appropriate product profile and complete all applicable portions. Please note, product profiles will not be counted towards the proposal page limit. If you have questions about how to complete the product profile, please request a consultation with your site leader. Site leader contact information can be found in the “Questions” section at the bottom.

    Product Profile Template

    Download Link

    Device Product Profile

    Diagnostic Product Profile

    Therapeutic Product Profile

Technical requirements: Items 5-9 above are document uploads (doc or pdf). Minimum specifications are Arial, 11-points, half-inch margins on all sides, 8 � x 11 paper. Commercial Assessment form can be downloaded here. Letters of Support are not accepted for pre-applications.  Please note, references and abstracts will not be counted towards the proposal two-page limit

REVIEW CRITERIA

Review Criteria

Review Questions

Location within the Proposal

Unmet Need

  • Why is this a significant problem?
  • What is the associated prevention, mortality or costs?
  • Have the users of this technology been identified?
  • Significance
  • Innovation and Impact

Innovation and Impact

  • Is the proposed solution linked to an unmet need?
  • How is this proposed solution innovative?
  • If successful, will the proposed solution be transformative?
  • Innovation and Impact
  • Competition

Competition

  • Are competitive technologies addressed?
  • Competition

Work Plan and Specific Aims

  • Is the plan well described?
  • Is the plan feasible and consistent with the budget?
  • Does the proposal build on prior work or data?
  • Will the work advance the technology to a maturity appropriate for application of a UC CAI Technology Development Award?
  • Will the work advance the technology to a significant value point (e.g., licensing, investment, target validation, prototype generation)?
  • Work Plan
  • Potential Risks and Mitigations
  • Budget

Investigators

  • Do investigators have the necessary strengths and expertise to accomplish the work plan and aims?
  • Biosketches

Intellectual Property

  • Has invention disclosure occurred?
  • Has a patent application been filed?
  • Has a patent been approved?
  • Is there a previous licensing event and how does this affect the IP strategy?
  • Commercial Assessment

SUBMISSION DATES AND TIMES

RFA release: Oct 17, 2016
Application due: Nov 23, 2016 5 PM PT
Application notification: Dec 22, 2016
Earliest start date: Jan 1, 2017

Additional Information: Successful applicant co-PIs must provide their field of specialization, their NIH Commons ID and their IRB and/or IACUC protocol numbers, if applicable, before funds are released. Recipients must credit NHLBI and cite grant number U54HL119893 in publications that result from this funding.

QUESTIONS

About application requirements and process:

UC Davis
Laura Marcu
Site Leader
lmarcu@ucdavis.edu

Anuurad Erdembileg
Site Administrator
anuerdem@ucdavis.edu

UC Irvine
Elliot Botvinick
Site Leader
elliot.botvinick@uci.edu

Andria Pontello
Project Manager
apontell@uci.edu

UCLA
Tomas Ganz
Site Leader
tganz@mednet.ucla.edu

Breanna Davis
Project Manager
bjdavis@mednet.ucla.edu

UC San Diego
Robert Ross
Site Leader
rross@ucsd.edu

Vish Krishnan
Skills Development Leader
vkrishnan@ucsd.edu

UC San Francisco
Roopa Ramamoorthi
Project Manager
Roopa.Ramamoorthi@ucsf.edu

Nathaniel Prorok
Site Administrator
Nathaniel.Prorok@ucsf.edu

About the website and online submission tool:
Rey Encarnacion
Technical Support
rfpsupport@mednet.ucla.edu

 

Selection Process & FAQs

Understanding the Selection Process

Background

  • Annual solicitation across three platforms
    1. Therapeutics
    2. Devices (including digital/wireless health)
    3. Diagnostics
    4. Tools
  • Awards of up to $200K for two years
  • Eligibility
    1. Faculty in all series and ranks at UC Davis, UC Irvine, UCLA, UC San Diego, and UC San Francisco
    2. Postdoctoral scholars are eligible to submit applications as Co-PI with a faculty PI
    3. Projects with existing or imminent target validation and a clear clinical indication
    4. Patents or patent applications are filed or potential for obtaining defensible intellectual property is strong
  • There is a two-stage submission process consisting of a pre-application and an invitation-only full application

Is the Technology Development Award budget capped at $200,000?

Most Technology Development Awards provide up to $200,000 for direct costs. However, if you feel your technology would substantially benefit from up to $400,000, please submit a budget, milestones and timelines at both funding levels. The award may be used over one or two years.

Is the Stimulus Funding Award budget capped at $50,000?

Stimulus Funding Awards provide up to $50,000 for direct costs. The award may be used over six months

Are indirect costs allowed?

Indirect costs do not need to be addressed in the budget for your proposal. Please contact your site administrator for additional guidance.

Can the proposed budget be a non-binding estimate?

Yes.

What if my IP is held by a UC campus that is not participating in the Center?

You may still apply. The important questions for reviewers are whether you have freedom to operate and whether your work in the Center will result in creation of new IP.

Is the application process confidential?

The application process is completely confidential. The Center is committed to protecting existing IP and new IP that is developed as a project moves forward.

Can I submit a lung cancer project?

Because cancer is not in NHLBI’s disease portfolio, the Center will not review applications that specifically target cancer, including lung and blood cancers. Projects that target a disease in NHLBI’s portfolio but have potential utility against cancer are acceptable.

Which diseases are in NHLBI’s portfolio?

A list of diseases targeted by this opportunity can be viewed here.

Who is eligible to submit an application?

All faculty in all ranks at UC Davis, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego and San Francisco are eligible. Faculty at affiliated institutions are not eligible

Are post docs eligible?

Post docs may submit with a faculty Co-PI.

I am a UCSF PI with a UC Santa Cruz co-PI. Am I eligible to apply?

Yes. You may partner with a UC investigator at another UC campus.

Who do I contact if I have problems with the online submission tool?

Please email rfpsupport@mednet.ucla.edu for assistance. Allow 24 hours for a response.

May I submit more than one application?

Yes. There is no limit on the number of pre-applications you may submit.

Does the pre-application require an institutional signature?

No.

Can I view my application after it is submitted?

Yes. You may view your submitted application but you cannot make changes to it. If you want to change a submitted application, you must delete your applications and upload an new one.

I received outside funding for my project. Can I withdraw my proposal?

Yes, you may delete your proposal by clicking the “delete” button.

NHLBI Introduction to the UC CAI

UC CAI Webinar

Loading the player

If you do not see the streaming player, please reload the page and ensure that you have javascript turned on.

NIDA Introduction to the UC CAI

Loading the player

If you do not see the streaming player, please reload the page and ensure that you have javascript turned on.

Click here to download the slides from the webinar.

Awardees

Visit our UC CAI Funded Technologies page to see the full list of awardees.

UC Davis Team

Laura Marcu, PhD
Site Leader
lmarcu@ucdavis.edu


UC Irvine Team

Elliot Botvinick, PhD
Site Leader
elliot.botvinick@uci.edu


UCLA Team

Tomas Ganz, MD, PhD
Site Leader
tganz@mednet.ucla.edu

Elvira Liclican, PhD
Project Manager          
eliclican@mednet.ucla.edu

UC San Diego Team

Robert Ross, MD
Site leader
rross@ucsd.edu


UC San Francisco Team

Roopa Ramamoorthi, PhD           
Project Manager
roopa.ramamoorthi@ucsf.edu